50 and 55 are new in LRFD A441 not available in LRFD A572 Gr.
42 of ASD, not available in LRFD A529 Gr. Load Combinations and load factors ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based on the forces and moments capacity Static analysis is acceptable for ASD but nonlinear geometric analysis is required for LRFD Beams and flexural members Cb computationĥ ASD Load Combinations 1.0D + 1.0L 0.75D + 0.75L + 0.75WĠ.75D L E D = dead load L = live load W = wind load E = earthquake loadĦ ASD Load Combinations Or you can use following load combinations with the parameter ALSTRINC to account for the 1/3 allowable increase for the wind and seismic load 1.0D + 1.0L 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0W 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0E PARAMETER $ ALSTRINC based on the % increase ALSTRINC LOADINGS 2 3ġ.2D + 1.6W + 0.5L 1.2D ± 1.0E + 0.5L 0.9D ± (1.6W or 1.0E) D = dead load L = live load W = wind load E = earthquake loadĨ Deflection Load Combinations for ASD and LRFDġ.0D + 1.0L + 1.0W 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0E D = dead load L = live load W = wind load E = earthquake loadĩ Forces and Stresses ASD = actual stress values are compared to the AISC allowable stress values LRFD = actual forces and moments are compared to the AISC limiting forces and moments capacityġ0 ASTM Steel Grade Comparison is between Table 1 of the AISC ASD 9th Edition on -7 versus Table 2-1 of the AISC LRFD 3rd Edition on -24 A529 Gr. General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD Hamid Zand GT STRUDL Users Group Las Vegas, Nevada June 22-25, 2005 GT STRUDL, CASE CenterĢ AISC ASD and LRFD AISC = American Institute of Steel ConstructionĪSD =Ěllowable Stress Design AISC Ninth Edition LRFD = Load and Resistance Factor Design AISC Third Editionġ963 AISC ASD 6th Edition 1969 AISC ASD 7th Edition 1978 AISC ASD 8th Edition 1989 AISC ASD 9th Edition 1986 AISC LRFD 1st Edition 1993 AISC LRFD 2nd Edition 1999 AISC LRFD 3rd Edition
1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
0 kommentar(er)
